01 · Overview
AISTEEL 2026 controlled workflow
-
STEP 1
Register
Create an edition-specific registration and complete the participant profile.
-
STEP 2
Verify student
Student evidence must be approved; UNIMED registrants provide their study program.
-
STEP 3
Upload full paper
A Presenter submits version 1 directly before the submission deadline.
-
STEP 4
Initial screening
The committee records Passed, Revision, or Rejected with an auditable reason.
-
STEP 5
Structured review
Assigned reviewers complete six criteria and evidence-based feedback.
-
STEP 6
Decision and payment
Revisions stay versioned; an accepted presenter becomes payment-eligible.
02 · Conference editions
One account, separate yearly records
Each edition has its own registration code, fee snapshot, student/payment verification, manuscript, reviews, settings, and audit timeline. A 2026 registration does not overwrite archived 2025 data.
Use the dashboard edition selector to open a year you are permitted to access. A manuscript keeps the workflow mode recorded when it was created, even if the chair later changes the default for new submissions.
If a migrated record is marked as requiring edition confirmation, contact the committee with its registration code. Do not create a duplicate account or delete an old paper as a shortcut.
03 · Participant
Attend without presenting
- Select Participant, origin, and Normal/Student status. The system stores the fee active at registration as an immutable historical snapshot.
- Enter the institution exactly. Registrants from Universitas Negeri Medan (UNIMED) must also enter their study program.
- A Student registration requires evidence and chair approval before payment eligibility.
- Use Edit profile to correct phone, institution, or study-program data without changing the yearly registration identity.
- Upload JPG, PNG, or PDF payment proof before 17 Sep 2026. A rejected proof may be corrected; an approved proof cannot be replaced.
04 · Presenter
Upload the full paper, pass screening, and complete review
Version 1: choose the correct topic, complete title/summary/keywords, and upload PDF, DOC, or DOCX by 25 Aug 2026. Do not create a duplicate submission.
Screening: the committee records Passed, Revision, or Rejected with a reason. Passed moves to reviewer assignment; Revision opens one controlled corrected-version upload.
Peer review: reviewers use the structured web rubric. When the chair decides Revision, upload the next version from the same workspace. Previous files, decisions, and feedback remain in the timeline.
Acceptance and payment: an accepted Presenter becomes payment-eligible after student verification when applicable. Payment approval does not request another copy of the accepted full paper.
05 · Payment
Fee snapshots and verification
Historical integrity
Fee, category, and currency are copied into the edition registration. Later chair price changes apply only to new registrations.
Auditable rejection
The chair must give a reason. The rejected proof remains in private history while the registrant is allowed to upload a corrected file.
06 · Reviewer
Review only assigned manuscripts
- Use Pending Abstracts and Pending Full Papers for open work; submitted work becomes read-only History.
- Complete all six 1–5 criteria: relevance, originality, methodology, evidence/results, clarity/organization, and reference/template readiness.
- Choose Accept, Minor revision, Major revision, or Reject and write strengths, required revisions, author-visible comments, and optional confidential chair comments.
- The web rubric is authoritative. An annotated PDF/DOC/DOCX is optional supporting evidence, not a replacement for the structured fields.
- Confirm ethical review and absence of conflict of interest. Do not identify, share, or download manuscripts outside the assigned purpose.
07 · Chairman
Operate each edition safely
Conference Editions
Create or activate an edition, select workflow mode, control registration/submission/screening, and reconcile ambiguous legacy records.
Students & Payments
Verify evidence, reject with a useful reason, and monitor edition-scoped pending queues.
Screening & Peer Review
Screen the latest version, assign topic-aware reviewers, monitor quota, and decide only after all assigned reviews are submitted.
Users
Search and edit participant/staff credentials, with an optional password reset. The last chair and self-role protections remain enforced.
Reports
Export edition-scoped registration, payment, manuscript, screening, and structured-review recaps as private XLSX workbooks.
Settings
Maintain dates, fees, bank instructions, file limits, review policy, and public metadata separately for the selected edition.
08 · Status glossary
What dashboard states mean
- Screening pending
- The latest manuscript version is waiting for a committee screening decision.
- Under Review
- Reviewers are assigned to the current abstract round or latest full-paper revision.
- Accepted / approved
- The current gate is complete and the next eligible action becomes available.
- Revision required
- Read the reason and upload a corrected version from the same workspace before its deadline.
- Rejected
- The item was not approved. A payment proof may be corrected; manuscript actions follow the recorded decision.
- Closed
- The deadline passed or the chair disabled that edition action; the server blocks new uploads.
09 · Help
Before contacting the committee
- Confirm the selected conference edition and read the current status/timeline.
- Check the permitted file type, maximum size, and relevant deadline.
- Use the same email account and avoid creating duplicate registrations.
- Include your registration code and manuscript title when contacting aisteel@unimed.ac.id; never send your password or a private document through an untrusted channel.